Legal Opinion

Reed v. City of Tulsa

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 6, 1964No. 40699PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Justice.

This is an original proceeding by Edward J. Reed, claimant, to review an order of the State Industrial Court denying his claim for compensation against the City of Tulsa, respondent.

Claimant filed his claim before the State Industrial Court on February 28, 1962, alleging that on October 19, 1961, while employed by respondent and in the course of his employment he sustained an accidental injury consisting of a “heart attack precipitated by exertion and strain of lumbar muscles, ligaments and tendons, neck strain.”

The evidence discloses that claimant was employed by respondent…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Brookshire v. Knippers Plumbing CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964
  2. Bray v. State Industrial CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964
  3. Bates v. State Industrial CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Gleason v. State Industrial CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
  2. Griffin v. Flint Steel CorporationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
  3. Wheaton v. City of Tulsa Fire DepartmentCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1998
  4. Black v. Renshaw PaintingCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1991
  5. Seminole Company v. YanceySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1973

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API