Legal Opinion

People v. Maldonado

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 26, 1999No. E021856, E021904PublishedCited by 4 opinions

[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WARD, J.

Defendants and appellants Paul Hernandez Adame and Jeremy Raymond Maldonado appeal after each was convicted of the first degree premeditated murder of Jose Canchóla. Defendant Adame raises several issues concerning instructions on lesser offenses, corroboration of accomplice testimony, and the propriety of street gang enhancements. Defendant Maldonado joins in these contentions, and argues that (1) the court should have given voluntary manslaughter instructions, and (2) it was improper to use the testimony of an accomplice, while giving the accomplice favorable sentencing…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. People v. Lance W.California Supreme Court · 1985
  2. People v. MorrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  3. United States v. Sonya Evette SingletonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
  4. United States v. Sonya Evette Singleton, National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, Amicus CuriaeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
  5. People v. SullyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. ErvinCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  2. People v. ColemanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  3. People v. PalmerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  4. People v. ErvinCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API