Hatcher v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MATTINGLY-MAY, Judge.
William E. Hatcher appeals his convietion of dealing in a schedule II controlled substance.1 He raises three issues, which we consolidate and restate as two:
1. Whether the State was required to prove Hatcher had manufactured methamphetamine for the use of another; and
2. Whether the trial court erred in overruling Hatcher's motion for a mistrial after a defense witness testified about the contents of a note that had not been produced in response to a discovery motion.
We affirm.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
In November of 2000, Hatcher asked his former brother-in-law,…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Stephenson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
- United National Insurance v. DePrizioIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
- Riley v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. RansIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000
- Ad Craft, Inc. v. Board of Zoning AppealsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1998
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Murray v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003
- White v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006
- Bradley v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
- Poe v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
- Armstrong v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.