Legal Opinion
Kittredge v. Grannis
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 5, 1926No. Appeal No. 2PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtClarke, P. J.
This is an action against the firm of Grannis & Lawrence, composed of the defendant Arthur E. Grannis and Robert C. Lawrence, general partners, and William C. Langley, special partner. The action against William C. Langley was dismissed, it having been established on a senarate trial that he was a special partner, and so not a proper party to an action against his firm. (See Partnership Law of 1919, §§ 96, 97, 98.) Arthur E. Grannis was and is a resident of Massachusetts and was not served with process.
Upon a former trial of this action the plaintiff obtained a judgment in the sum of…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Miller v. . SchlossNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Schenck v. . State Line Telephone Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1924
- Conaughty v. . NicholsNew York Court of Appeals · 1870
- Rothschild v. . MackNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Snow v. AlleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In re MillingtonNew York Supreme Court · 1947
- Luboch v. Sidey's, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1962