Legal Opinion

Steinman v. Blumenfeld

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided December 15, 1908PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal by the defendant from an order denying a motion to open a default, entered in the Municipal Court of the city of New York, second district, borough of Manhattan.

1Opinion of the CourtHendrick, J.

This action was brought to recover for one month’s rent of premises occupied by the defendant. The defendant defaulted in appearing, and an inquest was taken, and plaintiff had a judgment. Subsequently, one Bertha Blumenfeld obtained an order to show cause why her default should not be opened and, this motion coming on to be heard, it was denied. Whether or not this “ Bertha ” Blumenfeld is the person sued as “ Mary ” does not appear. Thereafter, Bertha Blumenfeld obtained a second order to show cause why she should not be granted the same relief as asked for in the first motion, and the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Colwell v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadNew York Supreme Court · 1908

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Blaustein v. LyonsAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1911
  2. Charles Wissman Co. v. StokesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913
  3. Solomonick v. LevyAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API