City of Philadelphia v. Philadelphia Parking Authority
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
2Per curiam
AND NOW, this 31st day of May, 2002, the order of the Commonwealth Court is VACATED and the matter is RE*431MANDED to the Commonwealth Court for disposition on the merits. In light of our disposition of the jurisdictional issue, we hereby lift the stay of further implementation of Act 22. Appellant’s Petition for Contempt is DENIED as moot.
Justice CASTILLE files a Concurring Statement which is joined by Justice NIGRO. Justice SAYLOR files a Concurring Statement. Chief Justice ZAPPALA files a Dissenting Statement which is joined by Justice CAPPY.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Commonwealth v. ChmielSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- City of Philadelphia v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- City of Philadelphia v. SchweikerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Blount v. Philadelphia Parking AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- James J. Gory Mechanical Contracting, Inc. v. Philadelphia Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.