Legal Opinion

City of Philadelphia v. Philadelphia Parking Authority

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 31, 2002No. Appeal 28 EAP 2001PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

2Per curiam

AND NOW, this 31st day of May, 2002, the order of the Commonwealth Court is VACATED and the matter is RE*431MANDED to the Commonwealth Court for disposition on the merits. In light of our disposition of the jurisdictional issue, we hereby lift the stay of further implementation of Act 22. Appellant’s Petition for Contempt is DENIED as moot.

Justice CASTILLE files a Concurring Statement which is joined by Justice NIGRO. Justice SAYLOR files a Concurring Statement. Chief Justice ZAPPALA files a Dissenting Statement which is joined by Justice CAPPY.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. ChmielSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  2. City of Philadelphia v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  3. City of Philadelphia v. SchweikerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  4. Blount v. Philadelphia Parking AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  5. James J. Gory Mechanical Contracting, Inc. v. Philadelphia Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API