Legal Opinion

You Vang Yang v. Sturner

District Court, D. Rhode Island

Decided November 9, 1990No. Civ. A. 88-0242 PPublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ADDENDUM

PETTINE, Senior District Judge.

On January 12, 1990, this Court released an opinion granting summary judgment on the issue of liability to the plaintiffs, the Yangs, for the emotional distress they suffered as a result of the defendant’s, Dr. Stumer’s, violation of their First Amendment rights. The facts of the case are set out in this Court’s opinion at 728 F.Supp. 845 (D.R.I.1990). In brief, Dr. Sturner, Rhode Island’s Chief Medical Examiner, conducted an autopsy on the Yangs’ son. This autopsy violated their deeply held religious beliefs. The Yangs are Hmongs, originally from Laos,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Employment Div., Dept. of Human Resources of Ore. v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. You Vang Yang v. SturnerDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1990

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Tanzin v. TanvirSupreme Court of the United States · 2020
  2. Fulton v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of the United States · 2021
  3. Alabama v. Trustees of the Big Sandy Independent School DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 1993
  4. Belgard v. State of HawaiiDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1995
  5. Apache Stronghold v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API