Legal Opinion
Amantia v. Cantwell
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided August 9, 1965PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
89 N.J. Super. 7 (1965)
213 A.2d 251
DOMINIC S. AMANTIA ET AL., PETITIONERS,
v.
JAMES F. CANTWELL, AS REQUEST OFFICER FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, AND JOHN A. KERVICK, TREASURER, OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, RESPONDENTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued August 9, 1965.
Decided August 9, 1965.
Before Judges MINTZ, PASHMAN and MATTHEWS.
Mr. George Warren argued the cause for petitioners (Mr. William L. Boyan, on the brief).
Mr. Donald M. Altman argued the cause for respondents (Mr. Arthur J. Sills, Attorney General, attorney).
2Per curiam
Petitioners, full-time employees in the New Jersey…
3Cases cited16 opinions
- Ford Motor Co. v. Department of TreasurySupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Fitts v. McGheeSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Maryland Ex Rel. Levin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Abelson's, Inc. v. New Jersey State Board of OptometristsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
- Taylor v. New Jersey Highway AuthoritySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1956
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by9 opinions
- Baraka v. McGreeveyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
- City of Camden v. ByrneSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
- Karcher v. KeanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
- New Jersey Division of Youth & Family Services v. D.C.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1990
- Graziano v. MAYOR & TP. COMMITTEE OF MONTVILLE TP.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.