Corkhill v. Camden & Suburban Railway Co.
Supreme Court of New Jersey
On rule to show cause.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Pitney, J.
This action was brought against the present defendant and the Pennsylvania Railroad Company, to re*98cover damages for- personal injuries alleged to have been sustained by Mrs. Corkhill while a passenger upon a street car of the Camden and Suburban Railway Company at the crossing of that railway over the tracks of the Pennsylvania Railroad Company. Upon the trial a nonsuit was ordered with respect to the latter company. This ruling is not complained of. The plaintiffs recovered verdicts as against the present defendant, and a new trial is asked…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Consolidated Traction Co. v. ThalheimerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1896
3Cited by4 opinions
- Dallas Ry. & Terminal Co. v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941
- Daggett v. North Jersey Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1907
- Faul v. North Jersey Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1904
- Budner v. Public Service Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1907