Legal Opinion

Swaim v. Texas Electric Service Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 8, 1979No. 18180PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HUGHES, Justice.

Virgil Swaim and wife, Bertha Bee, plaintiffs in trial court, have appealed a summary judgment granted Texas Electric Service Company. Their suit was a bill of *789review action to set aside the judgment in a condemnation suit involving the same parties.

We affirm.

The Swaims’ complaint in this appeal is that the trial court did not deny TESCO’s summary judgment motion in the face of Swaims’ pleadings and affidavits which allegedly stated, as a matter of law, a cause of action against TESCO. They allege that, at the hearing before the special commissioners (in condemnation),…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. White v. Natural Gas Pipeline Company of AmericaTexas Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Neigut v. McFaddenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1953
  3. Pentikis v. Texas Electric Service CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1971
  4. Brunson v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Banks v. CrawfordCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1959

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Harris County v. ComstockCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1985
  2. K & S Interests, Inc. v. Texas American Bank/Dallas, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1988
  3. K & S Interests, Inc. v. Texas American Bank/Dallas, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API