Legal Opinion
Johnson v. Reilly
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided August 26, 2010No. Civil Action 09-1390 (PLF)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, District Judge.
Plaintiff, a District of Columbia prisoner currently confined at the Federal Correctional Institution in Cumberland, Maryland, sues the United States Parole Commission (“USPC”) for allegedly violating the ex post facto clause of the United States Constitution during his parole proceedings. He claims that the USPC applied its own guidelines issued in 2000 when it should have applied guidelines issued by the former District of Columbia Parole Board in 1987 in conjunction with the Board’s 1991 policy guideline. See 74 FR 58540-01 (Nov. 13,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Powell v. McCormackSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States v. Philip Morris USA Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2009
- Del Monte Fresh Produce Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2009
- Robert Franklin v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1999
- Sellmon v. ReillyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Dufur v. U.S. Parole Comm'nCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Jones v. United States Parole CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Singletary v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Singletary v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011