Oregon Motor Co. v. Carter
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBossman, J.
The first assignment of error is based upon the court’s action in overruling plaintiff’s objection to the following question asked on cross-examination: “Mr. Lemon: This note, plaintiff’s exhibit ‘A’ was executed at the same time, an additional paper, the conditional sales contract was made between the Oregon Motor Company and the defendants in this case?” Mr. Lemon was secretary of the plaintiff; the objection was, that the question did not constitute proper cross-examination. The witness had produced the note mentioned in the complaint and it had been received in evidence. But the de…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- International Harvester Co. v. BauerOregon Supreme Court · 1917
- First Nat. Bank v. YocomOregon Supreme Court · 1920
- Standring v. GordonOregon Supreme Court · 1926
3Cited by3 opinions
- Jackson v. Clackamas Meat Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1942
- C. I. T. Corporation v. CoreyIdaho Supreme Court · 1938
- Pacific Finance Corp. v. EllithorpeOregon Supreme Court · 1930