State v. Alim
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
MARY J. BOYLE, P.J.:
{¶ 1} Plaintiff-appellant, state of Ohio, appeals from a judgment granting the motion to suppress of defendant-appellee, Ibraham Alim. The state raises one assignment of error for our review:
The trial court erred when granting the motion to suppress evidence and statements.
{¶ 2} Finding merit to the state's appeal, we reverse and remand.
I. Procedural History and Factual Background
{¶ 3} The Cuyahoga County Grand Jury indicted Alim on six counts: trafficking and possession of heroin in violation of R.C. 2925.03(A)(2), a third-degree felony, and R.C. 2925.11(A), a…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. TaylorOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
- State v. JamesOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
- State v. TaylorOhio Court of Appeals · 2020