Legal Opinion

State v. Alim

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 7, 2017No. 105164PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARY J. BOYLE, P.J.:

{¶ 1} Plaintiff-appellant, state of Ohio, appeals from a judgment granting the motion to suppress of defendant-appellee, Ibraham Alim. The state raises one assignment of error for our review:

The trial court erred when granting the motion to suppress evidence and statements.

{¶ 2} Finding merit to the state's appeal, we reverse and remand.

I. Procedural History and Factual Background

{¶ 3} The Cuyahoga County Grand Jury indicted Alim on six counts: trafficking and possession of heroin in violation of R.C. 2925.03(A)(2), a third-degree felony, and R.C. 2925.11(A), a…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  5. United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. TaylorOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
  2. State v. JamesOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
  3. State v. TaylorOhio Court of Appeals · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API