Legal Opinion

Doe v. Wilmington Housing Authority

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided June 6, 2014No. 12-3433UnpublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ROSENTHAL, District Judge:

Appellants Jane Doe and Charles Boone sued the Wilmington Housing Authority (WHA), challenging parts of its revised firearms policy under the Second Amendment of the United States Constitution and Article I, Section 20 of the Delaware Constitution. The United States District Court for the District of Delaware held that the Common Area Provision (paragraph 3) and the Reasonable Cause Provision (paragraph 4) of the revised policy did not offend either the Second Amendment or Article I, Section 20. Doe v. Wilmington Hous. Auth, 880 F.Supp.2d 513, 536-39…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Doe v. Wilmington Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of Delaware · 2014
  2. Doe v. Wilmington Housing AuthorityDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2012

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. CunninghamAppellate Court of Illinois · 2019
  2. Bridgeville Rifle & Pistol Club, Ltd. v. SmallSupreme Court of Delaware · 2017
  3. Bridgeville Rifle & Pistol Club, Ltd. v. SmallSupreme Court of Delaware · 2017
  4. Hunter v. Cortland Housing AuthorityDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2024
  5. State v. DeCiccioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API