Legal Opinion

Kevin Wiggins v. Sewall Smith, Warden

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 26, 2003No. 02-311Published

1Opinion of the Court 1

537 U.S. 1231

123 S.Ct. 1382

155 L.Ed.2d 194

KEVIN WIGGINS, PETITIONER

v.

SEWALL SMITH, WARDEN, ET AL.

No. 02-311.

Supreme Court of United States.

Argued March 24, 2003.

Decided June 26, 2003.

In 1989, petitioner Wiggins was convicted of capital murder by a Maryland judge and subsequently elected to be sentenced by a jury. His public defenders, Schlaich and Nethercott, moved to bifurcate the sentencing, representing that they planned to prove that Wiggins did not kill the victim by his own hand and then, if necessary, to present a mitigation case. The court denied the motion. At sentencing, Nethercott…

Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · O'Connor; Opinion of the Court · O'Connor.

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Miller-El v. CockrellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  3. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Lockett v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API