Legal Opinion

Smith Corona Corporation v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided December 6, 1990No. 89-1387PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

915 F.2d 683

12 ITRD 1788

SMITH CORONA CORPORATION, Plaintiff/Cross-Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee,

and

Brother Industries, Ltd., Brother International Corp.;

Nakajima All Co., Ltd.; Canon Inc. and Canon U.S.A., Inc.;

Silver Seiko, Ltd., Silver Reed America, Inc.; Matsushita

Electric Industrial Co., Ltd., Kyushu Matsushita Electric

Industrial Co., Ltd., and Panasonic Company and Panasonic

Industrial Company, divisions of Matsushita Electric

Corporation of America, Defendants-Appellants.

Nos. 89-1387 to 89-1389 and 89-1398 to 89-1400.

United States Court of Appeals,

Federal Circuit.

Sept. 26,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Atlantic Sugar, Ltd. v. The United States and Amstar CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
  2. Smith-Corona Group v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
  3. Diversified Products Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1983
  4. Smith Corona Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
  5. Royal Business MacHines, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1980

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Win-Tex Products, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API