Legal Opinion

Neilands v. Wright

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 8, 1903No. Docket No. 11PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to Wayne; Frazer, J. Assumpsit by Abraham Neilands against Frederick J. Wright to recover a balance due upon a judgment. From a judgment for plaintiff on verdict directed by the court, defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtCarpenter, J.

This suit was commenced February 12, 1901, on a judgment rendered in justice court on the 25th of January, 1894. The defense was that the claim was barred by the statute of limitations. Defendant had made several payments, — the first • September 26, 1894, and the last December 10, 1900, — aggregating $169.75, to apply on said judgment. On the trial, defendant’s coun*78sel stated that the only question he raised was that payment on a judgment does not take it out of the statute of limitations. The trial was adjourned to the following day. He then stated:

“When payments were made on this judgment,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Jewett v. PetitMichigan Supreme Court · 1857
  2. Parsons v. ClarkMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Miner v. LormanMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Lester v. ThompsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1892

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hiscock v. HiscockMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Becenti v. LaughlinUnited States District Court · 1983
  3. Rowley v. WhiteMichigan Supreme Court · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API