Legal Opinion

George v. Conklin

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 4, 1960No. Docket 77, Calendar 47,828PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarr, J.

On .the 29th day of April, 1937, Patrick Henry Conklin and his wife Esther E. Conklin, residents of Genesee county, executed a written instrument which they declared “to be jointly as well as severally, our last will and testament.” Following the usual provision for the payment of debts and funeral expenses the will provided that the husband, if he survived the wife, should have a life estate in 40 acres of land referred to as the “Delaney homestead” which was the sole and separate property of Mrs. Conklin. On the decease of the survivor a life interest was given to Agnes Delaney and the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Carmichael v. CarmichaelMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Keasey v. EnglesMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Quarton v. BartonMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Schondelmayer v. SchondelmayerMichigan Supreme Court · 1948

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Rockwell v. Estate of Leon RockwellMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970
  2. In Re Bair EstateMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. McLean v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1963
  4. Gould v. PhelpsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. Rockwell v. Estate of Leon RockwellMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API