Page Woven Wire Fence Co. v. Pool
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Montcalm; Davis, J. Assumpsit by the Page Woven Wire Fence Company against Phoebe M. Pool on a promissory note. There was judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtOstrander, J.
This case has twice before been in this court. Page Woven Wire Fence Co. v. Pool, 129 Mich. 57, 133 Mich. 323. Upon each occasion a judgment for the defendant was reversed and a new trial ordered. Defendant has again recovered judgment. Upon the last trial, for the first time, evidence was given of the circumstances under which the note sued upon was paid by defendant. Upon the record eight errors are assigned, one of which relates to the admission of testimony, one to the refusal of the court to direct a verdict for the plaintiff, the others to the refusal of the court to charge as requested…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Page Woven Wire Fence Co. v. PoolMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
- Page Woven Wire Fence Co. v. PoolMichigan Supreme Court · 1903