Legal Opinion

Peterson v. Brook

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 7, 2003Published

1Opinion of the Court

—In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of a partnership agreement, the plaintiff appeals from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (O’Connell, J.), dated February 11, 2003, which granted that branch of the defendant’s motion pursuant to CPLR 5015 (a) (1) which was to vacate his default in answering the complaint, and (2) so much of an order of the same court dated March 6, 2003, as, in effect, granted that branch of the defendant’s motion which was to vacate the judgment.

Ordered that the order dated February 11, 2003, is affirmed; and it is further,

Ordered that…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Grutman v. Southgate at Bar Harbor Home Owners' Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  2. Picinic v. Seatrain Lines, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  3. Szilaski v. Aphrodite Construction Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  4. Britvan v. Sutton & Edwards, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  5. Furon Construction, Inc. v. VelezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API