Legal Opinion

Gosling v. Griffin

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1875PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal iii error from the First Circuit Court of Shelby County.

1Opinion of the Court

H, E. Jackson, Sp. J.

The material facts of this case necessary to be noticed in determining the legal question presented by the record are the following; On the 9th day of January, 1872, the defendant, T. S. Griffin, executed and delivered to Pollard & Co. his negotiable promissory note for the sum of $598, payable thirty days after date, *738tbe consideration for said note being the proceeds of a buggy which. Pollard & Co. had placed in said Griffin’s hands for sale, and which he had sold and used and appropriated the money. The payees in said note, being indebted to Plaintiff Goslin in the sum…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Rowland v. CraigCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1804
  2. Carr v. . LewisNew York Court of Appeals · 1859

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Daniel v. SpaethCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
  2. Wyoming County Bank v. NicholsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Union National Bank v. WatersCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1929
  4. Parker v. LuttrellCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API