Legal Opinion

Maynard v. City of Tupelo

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided February 27, 1997No. 93-CA-01112-SCTPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

691 So.2d 385 (1997)

Renee MAYNARD d/b/a Kountry Klub and Western Connection, Inc.

v.

CITY OF TUPELO, Mississippi, A Municipal Corporation; Jack Marshall, in his official capacity as mayor of the City of Tupelo, Mississippi; The City of Tupelo, Mississippi, Board of Aldermen; Paul Eason, Alderman at large, in his official capacity as a member of the Board of Aldermen for the City of Tupelo, Mississippi; Jack Williams, Alderman, in his official capacity as a member of the board of Aldermen for the City of Tupelo, Mississippi; Randy Heading, Alderman, in his official capacity as a member of the…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bi-Metallic Investment Co. v. State Board of EqualizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  2. Florida Rock Industries, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
  3. HATTIESBURG FIREF'T'RS v. City of HattiesburgMississippi Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Town of McCool v. BlaineMississippi Supreme Court · 1943

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. J&b Entertainment, Inc. v. City of Jackson, MississippiCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
  2. Mayor of Ocean Springs v. HOMEBLDRS. ASS'NMississippi Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Collins v. City of HazlehurstMississippi Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Ryals v. Board of Supervisors of Pike CountyMississippi Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Delphi Oil, Inc. v. Forrest County Board of SupervisorsMississippi Supreme Court · 2013

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API