Rowland v. Ramelli
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MOSK, J.
The significant problem in this case is the extent to which the State Water Resources Control Board (Board) has the power to define and otherwise limit prospective riparian rights when, pursuant to the statutory adjudication procedure set forth in Water Code section 2500 et seq., it determines all claimed rights to the use of water in a stream system. We conclude that the Legislature, in order to foster more reasonable and beneficial uses of state waters, has granted the Board broad authority to ascertain the nature of future riparian rights in this adjudication procedure. In…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Bernhard v. Bank of America National Trust & Saving AssociationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- National Labor Relations Board v. Catholic BishopSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Lux v. HagginCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Solberg v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- Coca-Cola Co. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In Re Waters of Long Valley Creek Stream SystemCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Norby Lumber Co. v. County of MaderaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
- Braray v. BraraySuperior Court of Guam · 2018
- Oliveras v. OliverasSuperior Court of Guam · 2020
- People v. McGaughy CA2/8California Court of Appeal · 2015