Legal Opinion

Rendleman v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided July 30, 1991No. 90-3333PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

CUMMINGS, Circuit Judge.

Elbert and Dorothy Rendleman appeal from the district court’s decision granting summary judgment in favor of Tammy L. Rendleman and awarding her the proceeds of a life insurance policy issued upon the life of their son, Larry Rendleman. Elbert and Dorothy Rendleman maintain that the district court erred in finding that Tammy Rendleman was the named beneficiary under the policy. They argue that Larry Rendleman changed the beneficiary under the policy after he divorced Tammy Rendle-man and before his death.

I. Background

In January 1985, Larry Rendleman began working for…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Davis v. Travelers Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1972
  2. Dooley v. James A. Dooley Associates Employees Retirement PlanIllinois Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Travelers Insurance Co. v. SmithAppellate Court of Illinois · 1982
  4. Connecticut General Life Insurance Company v. Hazel Jean GulleyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
  5. Cox v. Employers Life InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1975

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Dorothy Rendleman, and Elbert Rendleman, Plaintiff-Cross-Defendant-Appellant v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. Tammy L. Rendleman, Cross-Plaintiff-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API