Legal Opinion

Keen v. Osborne

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided November 11, 1919PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Leslie Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Sampson

Affirming.

Keen and Osborne are owners of adjoining tracts of land. They each claim a part of the "William Hoskins 125-acre patent issued September 9, 1868. This action was commenced by Keen on February 18, 1915, for the recovery of a certain described boundary of land within the Hoskins patent then in the possession of Osborne, and for the sum of $200 in damages.

Osborne filed an answer in which he traversed the allegations of the petition and averred that he was the owner of the tract of land in controversy, describing it by metes and bounds; that his…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Amburgy v. Burt & Brabb Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1905
  2. Warden v. AddingtonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1909
  3. Strange v. GessCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1901

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Breslin v. BlairCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
  2. Hoskins v. MorganCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923
  3. Rader v. GoeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
  4. Commonwealth Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929
  5. Carver v. TurnerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1949

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API