Legal Opinion

Cox v. East Tennessee Natural Gas Co.

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided December 22, 2003PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHerschel Pickens Franks, J.

in D. MICHAEL SWINEY, J., and WILLIAM H. INMAN, Sr. J., joined.

OPINION

In this declaratory judgment action to declare the rights between the dominant and servient estates relating to an easement, the Trial Court held that the landowner’s proposal to add fill dirt over the pipeline easement did not unreasonably interfere with defendant’s rights. Defendant has appealed. We reverse.

In this declaratory judgment action between the dominant and servient estate to determine their respective rights, the Trial Court held that the landowner’s proposal to add fill dirt over the pipeline easement did not…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Mid-America Pipeline Co. v. Lario Enters., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
  2. Mississippi River Transmission Corp. v. Wachter Construction, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1987

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Carl Wayne Hixson v. American Towers, LLCCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2019
  2. Charles Webster v. Steve L. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2018
  3. Jeffrey Heatley v. David G. GaitherCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2018
  4. John Shell and Connie Shell v. Sherri Cole Williams v. Rick ShellCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2014
  5. Lynn Rogers v. Jon RoachCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2012

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API