Legal Opinion

Sugrue v. Janssen

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided July 15, 1986No. 50178PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Judge.

Defendants appeal from an order denying their motion to set aside a default judgment. That judgment, rendered on a petition for declaratory judgment, set aside a *45quit claim deed executed by plaintiffs to defendants. We affirm.

Defendants’ first contention is that the default should have been set aside because of the failure to join lienholders of the property as indispensable parties under Rule 52.04. These lienholders are not identified nor does any interest of theirs appear which would be adversely affected by the judgment. Their interest in the land is as security for a debt.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Daffin v. DaffinMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. Human Development Corp. of Metropolitan St. Louis v. WefelMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. Polette v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1970
  4. Schoenhoff v. OwensMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978
  5. L.J. Ross, Co. v. VaughnMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hellwege v. LambMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. State ex rel. Missouri-Nebraska Express, Inc. v. JacksonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. Libby v. UptegroveMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999
  4. Turner v. TurnerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API