Marks v. Vehlow
Idaho Supreme Court
1DissentBistline, Justice
I
The majority opinion wholly declines to mention that the issue raised by the petition was the alleged validity of the Nebraska order — an issue which, insofar as the record discloses, was never decided. The majority mentions “the sanctity of the writ of habeas corpus” and “the discovery of a person sought by means of habeas corpus ... . ” The Great Writ, as it has been called, is recognized in our United States Constitution where it is referred to as “The Privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus ... . ” Indeed, it is a constitutional right of the highest magnitude, and came to us from the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- McNally v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Zerilli v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
- Nora v. Safeco InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 1978
- Sierra Life Insurance v. Magic Valley Newspapers, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1980
- Clampitt v. Thurston CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1983
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.