Legal Opinion · Dissent

Marks v. Vehlow

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided October 21, 1983No. 13938Published

1DissentBistline, Justice

I

The majority opinion wholly declines to mention that the issue raised by the petition was the alleged validity of the Nebraska order — an issue which, insofar as the record discloses, was never decided. The majority mentions “the sanctity of the writ of habeas corpus” and “the discovery of a person sought by means of habeas corpus ... . ” The Great Writ, as it has been called, is recognized in our United States Constitution where it is referred to as “The Privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus ... . ” Indeed, it is a constitutional right of the highest magnitude, and came to us from the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. McNally v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Zerilli v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
  3. Nora v. Safeco InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Sierra Life Insurance v. Magic Valley Newspapers, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Clampitt v. Thurston CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API