Legal Opinion

Wells v. Wells

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 26, 1944No. Civ. 3127PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarks, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment in the sum of $1,015.50 in an action for an accounting.

Plaintiff and defendant had been husband and wife but were divorced. They owned 286 acres of land near McKittrick in Kern County. In making a property settlement they conveyed the property to their children subject to the reservation of a life estate in themselves as joint tenants. Concurrently with the deed and by way of property settlement they executed a contract containing the following:

‘ ‘ Therefore, in consideration of the premises, it is agreed that the party of the first part (defendant) shall…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Tax Commissioner v. PutnamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
  2. Diefendorf v. GalletIdaho Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Fairchild v. Gray, New York County Courts1930
  4. Coudon v. TaitDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1932

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hammond v. McArthurCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Alameda County Flood Control & Water Conservation District v. Department of Water ResourcesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
  3. Teutenberg v. SchillerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  4. Gillette v. NicollsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  5. Scheppers v. ScheppersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API