Legal Opinion
In re Cinnabar 2000 Haircutters, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided June 4, 1982No. Bankruptcy No. 82 B 20298; Adv. No. 82 ADV 6090PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION ON COMPLAINT FOR RELIEF FROM AUTOMATIC STAY
HOWARD SCHWARTZBERG, Bankruptcy Judge.
Estee Lauder, Inc., the plaintiff in this adversary proceeding for relief from the automatic stay under 11 U.S.C. § 362, seeks to enforce an injunction judgment entered in its favor against the debtor in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, restraining the debtor from using the tradename “Cinnabar” in connection with its business. The debtor argues, among other things, that the term “Cinnabar” in connection with its name is an equitable property right of the debtor’s…
2Cited by6 opinions
- In Re Sonnax Industries, Inc., Debtor. Sonnax Industries, Inc. v. Tri Component Products Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- Seiko Epson Corporation and Epson America, Inc. v. Nu-Kote International, Inc. And Pelikan Produktions, A.G., Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- Rudaw/Empirical Software Products Ltd. v. Elgar Electronics Corp. (In Re Rudaw/Empirical Software Products Ltd.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1988
- Altchek v. Altchek (In Re Altchek)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1991
- Truebro, Inc. v. Plumberex Specialty Products, Inc. (In Re Plumberex Specialty Products, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · 2004
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.