Legal Opinion · Dissent

Ms. S. v. Regional School Unit 72

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided February 15, 2019No. 17-2214PPublished

1DissentLipez, Circuit Judge

From the vantage point of hindsight, my colleagues conclude that a clarifying interpretation of federal law rendered for the first time in 2015 cleanses an improper state administrative process that occurred five years earlier. I cannot agree that we should ignore the flaws in the rulemaking process and disregard the purpose of the bypassed procedures: to ensure that the public and Legislature understand, and have an opportunity to comment on, important changes in the law. In my view, the procedural irregularity requires us to *53affirm the district court's conclusion that a four-year filing…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. King v. BurwellSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
  2. G.L. v. Ligonier Valley School District AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2015
  3. Miguel Avila v. Spokane School District 81Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  4. Ms. S. v. Regional School Unit 72Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2016
  5. Fulkerson v. Commissioner, Maine Department of Human ServicesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API