Ms. S. v. Regional School Unit 72
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
1DissentLipez, Circuit Judge
From the vantage point of hindsight, my colleagues conclude that a clarifying interpretation of federal law rendered for the first time in 2015 cleanses an improper state administrative process that occurred five years earlier. I cannot agree that we should ignore the flaws in the rulemaking process and disregard the purpose of the bypassed procedures: to ensure that the public and Legislature understand, and have an opportunity to comment on, important changes in the law. In my view, the procedural irregularity requires us to *53affirm the district court's conclusion that a four-year filing…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- King v. BurwellSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
- G.L. v. Ligonier Valley School District AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2015
- Miguel Avila v. Spokane School District 81Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Ms. S. v. Regional School Unit 72Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2016
- Fulkerson v. Commissioner, Maine Department of Human ServicesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1993