Legal Opinion
Sherman v. Babcock
Washington Supreme Court
Decided August 21, 1916No. 13025PublishedCited by 7 opinions
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Dykeman, J., entered July 3, 1915, upon findings in favor of the defendant, in an action on contract, tried to the court.
1Per curiam
The appellant instituted this action against the defendant, Katie Jamieson, and the respondent, Mrs. T. A. Babcock, to recover upon a written contract for the erection of a tombstone. His complaint, omitting the formal parts, was as follows:
“Comes now the plaintiff herein, and for his cause of action against the said defendants, states and alleges:
“(1) That on the 31st day of October, 1910, the plaintiff and the said defendants entered into a written contract wherein and whereby the said defendants (the said defendant Katie Jamieson signing her name as Mrs. Robt. Jamieson) agreed to pay the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Ingham v. Harper & SonWashington Supreme Court · 1912
- Doty v. KrutzWashington Supreme Court · 1895
- Jaklewicz v. LenhartWashington Supreme Court · 1915
3Cited by7 opinions
- Bradley v. FowlerWashington Supreme Court · 1948
- Su Thao v. Control Data Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1990
- Baker v. OliverWashington Supreme Court · 1951
- Loveland v. RileyWashington Supreme Court · 1927
- Stark v. L. Ginsberg & SonsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1945
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.