Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Johnson

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided May 21, 1962No. 21660PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Duckworth, Chief Justice.

1. Adultery may be proved by circumstantial evidence, but such evidence must infer as a necessary conclusion that adultery was committed. But if such evidence is fairly susceptible of two interpretations, one consistent with innocence and the other with guilt, it is not sufficient to prove adultery. 17 Am. Jur. 552, Divorce and Separation, § 432; Weaver v. State, 74 Ga. 376; Starke v. State, 97 Ga. 193 (23 SE 832); Thompson v. State, 61 Ga. App. 624 (7 SE2d 189). And there must be both (1) an opportunity and (2) an adulterous disposition in order for adultery to be…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1961
  2. Davis v. DavisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
  3. Williams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  4. Hudson v. HudsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  5. Harrison v. OdumSupreme Court of Georgia · 1918

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Maloy v. DixonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
  2. Johnson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
  3. Simpson v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1974
  4. Hathcock v. HathcockSupreme Court of Georgia · 1982
  5. Gray v. GraySupreme Court of Georgia · 1970

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API