Legal Opinion

Charlene F. Giebe and Gerald R. Giebe v. Honorable Martin Pence and Chester H. Brower

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 19, 1970No. 26109PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Per curiam

Proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 144, the plaintiffs in Giebe v. Brower, Civil No. 3051 in the United States District Court for the District of Hawaii, moved in the district court to disqualify The Honorable Martin Pence, a judge of that court, from proceeding in that cause because of alleged personal bias and prejudice. The motion was supported by the affidavit of David N. Ingman, plaintiffs’ attorney of record, and by certain exhibits.

Two hearings were held upon the section 144 motion, following which it was denied.

Plaintiffs then applied to this court for a writ of prohibition or mandamus to…

2Cited by25 opinions

  1. Birdie Mae Davis, United States of America, Plaintiff-Intervenor, Edwin Foster, Plaintiff-Intervenor v. Board of School Commissioners of Mobile County, James E. Buskey v. Board of School Commissioners of Mobile County, Birdie Mae Davis, United States of America, Plaintiff-Intervenor, James E. Buskey, Plaintiff-Intervenor-Appellant v. Board of School Commissioners of Mobile CountyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
  2. Bernice ROBERTS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Benjamin F. BAILAR, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1980
  3. Davis v. Board of School CommissionersCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
  4. Wounded Knee Legal Defense/offense Committee v. The Federal Bureau of InvestigationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1974
  5. Paschall v. MayoneDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1978

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API