Legal Opinion

Montgomery v. Comm'r

United States Tax Court

Decided August 28, 2006No. 633-05Published

P-H, president and CEO of MGC Communications, Inc. (MGC), received incentive stock options (ISOs) from MGC between April 1996 and March 1999. In November 1999, P-H resigned as president and CEO of MGC and entered into an employment contract with MGC which included provisions accelerating the vesting dates of his ISOs. In early 2000, P-H exercised many of his ISOs.

Read the full summary

P-H, president and CEO of MGC Communications, Inc. (MGC), received incentive stock options (ISOs) from MGC between April 1996 and March 1999. In November 1999, P-H resigned as president and CEO of MGC and entered into an employment contract with MGC which included provisions accelerating the vesting dates of his ISOs. In early 2000, P-H exercised many of his ISOs. P-H subsequently sold shares of MGC stock in 2000 and 2001 at prices above and below the exercise prices that he paid for the shares. Ps filed a joint Federal income tax return for 2000 reporting total tax of $ 2,831,360, including…

1Opinion of the Court

NIELD AND LINDA MONTGOMERY, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent

Montgomery v. Comm'r

No. 633-05

United States Tax Court

127 T.C. 43; 2006 U.S. Tax Ct. LEXIS 23; 127 T.C. No. 3;

August 28, 2006, Filed

P-H, president and CEO of MGC Communications, Inc. (MGC),

received incentive stock options (ISOs) from MGC between April

1996 and March 1999. In November 1999, P-H resigned as president

and CEO of MGC and entered into an employment contract with MGC

which included provisions accelerating the vesting dates of his

ISOs. In early 2000, P-H exercised many of his ISOs. P-H

subsequently…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. HIGBEE v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUEUnited States Tax Court · 2001
  2. United States v. BoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 90,216 Magma Power Company v. The Dow Chemical CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
  4. Allen v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2002
  5. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 90,280 Margaret Gwozdzinsky, Derivatively on Behalf of Revco D.S., Inc. v. Zell/chilmark Fund, L.P. And Revco D.S., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API