Legal Opinion
State v. Brooks
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided February 28, 2001No. Nos. 00-KA-953 and 00-KA-954PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ON APPLICATION FOR REHEARING
JjPER CURIAM.
In its application for rehearing, the State argues that we erred in our original opinion because permitting the jury to view a videotape during deliberations was found to be within the discretion of the trial court in State v. Davis, 92-1623 (La.5/23/94), 637 So.2d 1012. The State also points out that the holding in Davis is the most recent statement of the law by the Louisiana Supreme Court on this issue. However, as we stated in our original opinion, the videotape in the Davis case was just that — a visual depiction of the incident without an audio…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. DavisSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
- State v. AdamsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1989
- State v. FreetimeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1974
- State v. FreetimeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1976
- State v. McCullySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1975
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. BrooksSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2003