Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Knox County Board of Commissioners v. Knox County Engineer

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 7, 2006No. 2005-0044Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partLundberg Stratton, J.

{¶ 19} I respectfully concur in the syllabus but dissent from the majority’s application of that syllabus and subsequent conclusion that liability insurance is not related to the function of operating Ohio’s highways.

*358{¶ 20} This case turns on our analysis of the phrase “relating to” as it appears in Section 5(a), Article XII of the Ohio Constitution. That section, in its entirety, states:

{¶ 21} “No moneys derived from fees, excises, or license taxes relating to registration, operation, or use of vehicles on public highways, or to fuels used for propelling such vehicles, shall be expended for…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Madden v. BowerOhio Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Board of County Commrs. v. Scioto County Budget Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API