Knox County Board of Commissioners v. Knox County Engineer
Ohio Supreme Court
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partLundberg Stratton, J.
{¶ 19} I respectfully concur in the syllabus but dissent from the majority’s application of that syllabus and subsequent conclusion that liability insurance is not related to the function of operating Ohio’s highways.
*358{¶ 20} This case turns on our analysis of the phrase “relating to” as it appears in Section 5(a), Article XII of the Ohio Constitution. That section, in its entirety, states:
{¶ 21} “No moneys derived from fees, excises, or license taxes relating to registration, operation, or use of vehicles on public highways, or to fuels used for propelling such vehicles, shall be expended for…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Madden v. BowerOhio Supreme Court · 1969
- Board of County Commrs. v. Scioto County Budget Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1969