Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Ritchie

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 23, 1981No. 287PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Following a jury trial, appellant was convicted of robbery. The trial court subsequently denied appellant’s post-verdict .motions and imposed sentence. No direct appeal was taken. Thereafter, appellant filed a petition pursuant to the Post Conviction Hearing Act (PCHA).1 After a hearing, the post-conviction court concluded that appellant had been denied his right to appeal from judgment of . sentence and granted him permission to file this appeal nunc pro tunc.

Appellant contends first that the trial court abused its discretion in refusing to grant a continuance which his trial counsel had…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Washington v. MaroneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  2. Commonwealth v. HubbardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  3. Commonwealth v. TwiggsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  4. Commonwealth v. HughesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  5. Commonwealth v. WatersSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MelendezSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. Commonwealth v. RitchieSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. Commonwealth v. RitchieSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API