Commonwealth v. Ritchie
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Per curiam
Following a jury trial, appellant was convicted of robbery. The trial court subsequently denied appellant’s post-verdict .motions and imposed sentence. No direct appeal was taken. Thereafter, appellant filed a petition pursuant to the Post Conviction Hearing Act (PCHA).1 After a hearing, the post-conviction court concluded that appellant had been denied his right to appeal from judgment of . sentence and granted him permission to file this appeal nunc pro tunc.
Appellant contends first that the trial court abused its discretion in refusing to grant a continuance which his trial counsel had…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Washington v. MaroneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
- Commonwealth v. HubbardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Commonwealth v. TwiggsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Commonwealth v. HughesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Commonwealth v. WatersSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Commonwealth v. MelendezSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Commonwealth v. RitchieSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Commonwealth v. RitchieSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981