Legal Opinion
Farr v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided September 17, 2013No. ED 99194PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GARY M. GAERTNER, JR., Judge.
Introduction
Michael Farr (Movant) appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying, without an evidentiary hearing, his Motion under Rule 29.151 to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Judgment and Sentence and Request for Evidentiary Hearing (Rule 29.15 Motion). We affirm.
Background
Movant was charged with one count of the class B felony of delivery of a controlled substance, and one count of the class C felony of possession of a controlled substance. These charges came about as the result of a police undercover operation, during which Officer Shirley McClain purchased…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- State v. SilveySupreme Court of Missouri · 1995
- Moss v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2000
- Sidebottom v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1989
- Forrest v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2009
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Polk v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017
- Darnell Hollings v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2023
- Edward D. Lusk v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2022
- Johnny M. Thomas v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2023
- Megan L. Hendricks, Movant/Appellant v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2023
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.