Dillingham v. Flack
New York Supreme Court
Appeal from special term, Mew York county. Action of replevin by Ezra C. Dillingham against James A. Flack, sheriff of the city and county of Mew York, and Hugo Meyer. Plaintiff appeals from an order denying a motion fora new trial, upon the grounds of surprise and newly-discovered evidence.
1Opinion of the CourtO’Brien, J.
The plaintiff brought an action of replevin against the defendants for the recovery of possession of certain personal property claimed by the plaintiff to belong to him, and which had been levied upon by the sheriff under an attachment issued at the instance of the defendant Meyer. The question at issue in the case was the validity of a certain bill of sale given by Christine S. Ferine to the plaintiff on the 8th of July, 1889, covering the stock of merchandise in the business of Mrs. Ferine, including likewise outstanding accounts, bills receivable, and the good-will pertaining to said…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Smith v. RentzNew York Supreme Court · 1893
- People v. BakerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
- People v. BakerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
- Upington v. KeenanNew York Supreme Court · 1893
- Roediger v. KraftNew York Supreme Court · 1915
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.