Legal Opinion

Pierce v. Kleinfeld

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1907PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal by the defendants from an order entered in the City Court of the city of Hew York, granting a motion made by defendants to be relieved from a default made by the defendants at the time when the case was called for trial.

1Per curiam

The case appeared on the day calendar for trial on Friday, January 11, 1907, when the trial judge granted an adjournment at the request of defendants’ attorney, until Monday, January fourteenth, stating at the *261time that “ the case would not again be passed and that the defendants must be ready for trial on the following Monday, and that, if Ml. Schleimer’s (defendants’ attorney) engagements were such that he would be unable to attend, the defendants must procure other counsel to try the case,” etc. On the following Monday there was an unfinished case on trial, and there was also ready for…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Goodness v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
  2. McEwen v. DimondAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Mitchell CountyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API