Legal Opinion

Langford v. First Nat. Bank of Atlanta

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 29, 1970No. 45371PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Evans, Judge.

1. The motion to dismiss the appeal is not meritorious since it is based upon the fact that the enumeration of errors refers to a wrong date (one then in the future) as to the *211order on summary judgment it complains of. Yet the notice of appeal refers to the correct date in the record which is the only order on summary judgment which is the subject matter of this appeal. Ga. L. 1965, p. 18, as amended by Ga. L. 1965, pp. 240, 243, and Ga. L. 1968, pp. 1072, 1077 (Code Ann. § 6-810) states that the enumeration or enumerations of error "need not set out or refer to portions of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bagley v. Firestone Tire & Rubber CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
  2. Munnerlyn v. Augusta Savings BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1891
  3. Bankers Fidelity Life Insurance v. O'BarrCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
  4. Harrell v. DavisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bingham v. Advance Industrial Security, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
  2. Langford v. First Nat. Bank of AtlantaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API