Legal Opinion
United States v. Danny Baca, United States of America v. Mary Marquez
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided December 4, 1969No. 112-69, 113-69PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TUTTLE, Circuit Judge.
The appellants, Baca and Marquez, were indicted and jointly tried before a jury in the United States District Court for the District of New Mexico and convicted of the unlawful possession of heroin in violation of 21 U.S.C.A. § 174. They appeal to this court contending that the heroin should not have been admitted into evidence because it was obtained as a result of an illegal search and seizure.
On July 2, 1968, the United States Parole Office in Albuquerque, New Mexico was informed by teletype that a Parole Violation Warrant had been issued that day for Danny Baca. On…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Sibron v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Preston v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- United States v. Alfred Earl HarflingerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1971
- United States v. Charles Albert MulliganCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
- United States v. Frank Armando CuaronCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983
- United States v. Russell Eugene BriddleCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1971
- State v. RobalewskiSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1980
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.