Legal Opinion

Wilkison v. Western Union Telegraph Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 26, 1936No. 4642Published

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, Justice.

In a suit for damages brought by appellant against appellee, trial was to the court and judgment for appellee.

Appellee objects to a consideration of appellant’s briefs, because neither proper assignments of error or propositions appear therein.

Appellant’s only assignment of error reads as follows: “The court erred in finding for the defendant and against the plaintiff on his cause of action.”

As typical of his propositions we copy the following: “A written instrument is construed against the writer of the instrument.”

The assignment is too general and the propositions mere…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Guaranty Mortgage & Realty Co. v. WhithamCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
  2. Hibbitts v. FarrierCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
  3. Battles v. CranfillCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API