Legal Opinion

United States v. Dixon

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided September 12, 1990No. Nos. 90-1766, 90-1792, 90-1821, 90-1835, 90-1836 and 90-1839PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McMILLIAN, Circuit Judge.

Defendants Noble Bennett, Delores Bennett, Johnnie Dentman, Donald Lewis, Willie Mack Dixon, Nathaniel Williams, Richard Hopkins, and Gerald Hopkins-Bey appeal from an order entered in the District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri denying their motions to dismiss an indictment pending against them after the district court declared a mistrial. For reversal defendants argue the district court failed to exercise its sound discretion in finding that “manifest necessity” justified declaration of a mistrial. For the reasons discussed below, we agree with the…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  5. Abney v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. United States v. Billie Jerome Allen, United States of America v. Norris G. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
  2. United States v. Randy PhelpsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
  3. Evelyn Louise Long v. Hubert H. Humphrey, IIICourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
  4. State v. BrimSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  5. United States of America, and v. Toney Bissett Ford, and Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API