Legal Opinion

Slater v. Kenny

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 19, 1941PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.

In this action to annul his marriage, plaintiff sets up two causes of action. The second is based upon alleged fraud by reason of which he claims to have been induced to enter the marriage. That claim is dismissed on the, ground that he has not proven a preponderance of evidence. The remaining cause of action alleges that he married the defendant not knowing that she already had a husband living, and that they did not live together *691after he learned of that fact. The issue of veracity, between the two parties mostly, is decided in her favor and, therefore, the only surviving allegation in the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Stokes v. . StokesNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
  2. Berry v. BerryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
  3. Brown v. BrownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912
  4. Tiedemann v. TiedemannNew York Supreme Court · 1916

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Presbrey v. PresbreyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1958
  2. Slater v. KennyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API