Legal Opinion

Cornelius v. Copeland

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 10, 1963No. 8 Div. 84PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAWSON, Justice.

This is a suit by Z. H. Cornelius against W. C. and Bobby Copeland. -The plaintiff stated his case against the defendants in t-wo counts. The first count is in detinue, seeking the recovery of particularly described items of gasoline • filling station equipment and machinery, while the second count is in trover. The defendants filed pleas of the general issue.

The plaintiff based his title and right of recovery on a mortgage executed- to him by one Edward Bellenger, who was deceased at the time of the trial.

Plaintiff rested after making out a prima facie case for recovery-…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Mervine v. WhiteSupreme Court of Alabama · 1874
  2. Brown v. Shelby CountySupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
  3. Crutcher v. Memphis & Charleston RailroadSupreme Court of Alabama · 1863
  4. Calvert v. J. M. Steverson & Sons Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1943
  5. Hiscox v. HendreeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1855

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Friedman v. FriedmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 2007
  2. Bryce Hospital Credit Union, Inc. v. Warrior Dodge, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1973
  3. Richardson v. First National Bank of Columbus, Ga.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1970
  4. Chrysler Credit Corporation v. TremerCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1972
  5. Ray v. BlackwellCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API