Legal Opinion
Executive Recruitment, Inc. v. Guste, Barnett & Shushan
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided October 11, 1988No. 88-CA-0336PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ARMSTRONG, Judge.
Plaintiff, Executive Recruitment, Inc. and Chuck Wohltmann, (“Wohltmann”), appeal the trial court’s granting defendant’s motion for summary judgment and the dismissal of Wohltmann’s legal malpractice claim. For the following reasons, we affirm the trial court’s judgment.
Defendants J.H. Henderson, III and his law firm of Guste, Barnett and Shushan, (“Henderson”) brought a suit on behalf of Wohltmann to recover $1,000.00 allegedly loaned by Wohltmann to his former employee, George Dorko, (“Dorko”). Dorko, in turn, filed what ultimately became a reconventional demand to recover…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Jenkins v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1982
- Meyers v. Imperial Cas. Indem. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1984
- Evans v. DetweilerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1985
- Jenkins v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1981
- Alfonso v. McIntyreLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1980
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Leonard v. ReevesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2012
- Teague v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2009