Legal Opinion

United States Ex Rel. Williams v. Franzen

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided November 3, 1981No. 80 C 6578PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARSHALL, District Judge.

Petitioners, Otis Williams and A. D. Clark, proceeding pro se, seek habeas corpus relief from an Illinois criminal conviction, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1976). Respondent, the Illinois Director of Corrections, has answered the petition and moved for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56, Fed.R.Civ.Pro. Petitioners have responded with a cross motion for summary judgment. The motions have been briefed and are ready for decision.

I

Petitioners were tried and convicted by a jury in Kankakee County Illinois of burglarizing the P & E Market. The trial judge sentenced them…

2Cases cited51 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Wainwright v. SykesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States of America Ex Rel. Otis Williams and A. D. Clark, Petitioners v. Gayle M. Franzen and Tyrone C. FahnerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
  2. People v. PowersAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994
  3. United States Ex Rel. Sullivan v. CuylerDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API