Legal Opinion
Humphrey v. Cumming
New York Supreme Court
Decided August 19, 1830PublishedCited by 8 opinions
Motion to vacate a rule discharging the defendant from an arrest on a ca. sa.
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court,
Sutherland, J.
This is a motion (hat (he rule entered on the 61I1 of August last, discharging (he defendant from arrest upon a ca. sa. issued in this cause, be vacated, and (hat the sheriff of Albany county be aulhuorized to retake the defendant upon (he same ca. sa., or if he cannot be arrested (hereon, (hat (he plain!iff*have leave, after (he return day thereof, to issue a new execution either against the person or property of (he defendant.
The defendant was properly discharged from arrest. It xvas shewn that he was actually attending court for the purpose of making a…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Central Trust Co. of New York v. Milwaukee St. Ry. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Wisconsin · 1896
- Petrie v. FitzgeraldNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1864
- Ela v. ElaSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1895
- Brower v. TatroMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
- State v. BlundellSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1877
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.